A little history...

Last weekend, my family and I went camping up around Aspen. So on one of the days, I took a trip to Aspen to see what was going on, and of course, I had to drive by my Grandma's (on my fathers side) first house she owned with her husband. A few years ago, the current owners did a major remodel and addition to the home. This isn't unusual for Aspen, as the town is famous for tear downs and McMansions.

Anyway, I was very impressed how the owners preserved the original house, and only added onto the rear of the house. From the street, you can hardly tell they added on. I felt that this showed a lot of restraint and respect for the history of architecture. Now my grandparents only owned this house for a few short years, but my family has a long history in Aspen and Snowmass. Can you believe, that my grandparents originally bought this house in 1935 (or so) including 5 city lots, overlooking a lake, for about $2,000? Of course, in those days, lakes were viewed as dumps.

Back in 1985, I took my grandma to Aspen as part of her 50th wedding anniversary. Unfortunately, my grandfather died a couple of years before. Anyway, we had the good fortune of running into the owner of the property at that time who was a retired lawyer from Chicago, who had owned the home for about 30 years. He was very happy to see us and knew who my grandma was! He showed us all around the property, and I was very fortunate to see the house. This is the same house my father was born in. On that trip, I was able to see the house where my grandma was raised, and the one she was born in! That home was vacant at the time and probably does not exist now.

The resort of Snowmass (the base village), was originally our family ranch. My grandfather was born on that ranch. Of course, the family sold it before it ever became the resort. But on that one, they preserved our original homestead and turned it into the Snowmass arts center! I was able to see the house where my grandpa was born, and the old barn. That facility is now known as the Anderson ranch. It obtained that name when my grandpa and his brother walked off the ranch one day, never to return. The ranch then went to there sister Hildur, who married a gent by the name of Bill Anderson, and the rest, they say, is history.

Habitat for Humanity

I have been involved with Habitat for Humanity of Fort Collins for over 10 years now. I have worked with them as a volunteer, on comittees, and several years as a board member. I have also worked with Habitat on designing several of the homes they have built. Recently I worked with them on their most ambitious project to date, a multi-family six plex being built in the Rigden Farm Neighborhood. While working with Habitat, we created a concept of four units facing a major street with two additional units above the detached garages facing the alley. This project was a challenge. We not only had to design these units to be functional with 2-4 bedrooms, but we also had to design them to meet ADA and Fair Housing guidelines. All on a sloping site!

Anyway, I have decided I am going to document the construction of these units on this blog.



Here is a picture of framing, the week of August 28th! The exterior walls are up of the first three units.



Another picture of the framing taken from the alley. You can see the foundation of the detached garages and the carraige units.



This is a picture I took a few weeks ago showing the floor framing in process. We had to drop the floor into the foundation to meet accessibility requirements.




And finally, here is a picture of the foundation walls being framed and poured.

August Fuglies!

Well, I know that I havn't exactly been keeping up with my fugly awards, but this one has been gnawing at me for some time now. This neighborhood is made up mostly of duplexes, all of them brick. Now I am not knocking brick, but more the overall architecture, or lack thereof. These homes have no characater. Most of them, you can't even find the front door! The door is tucked around the side of the home, with the patio door facing the street! Talk about look alike homes! I really don't see how the homeowners can tell one from the other. But, my bigger question is, who buys these homes, and why?

DIA: Why not Green?

Today, my family and myself traveled to Denver to DIA to pick up my mother-in-law. Generally, I like DIA. I think it is a gorgeous and functional airport, at least as far as airports go. Today though, I started thinking about ways that DIA can become more sustainable...especially in light of the recent Greenprint Denver that Mayor Hickenlooper recently outlined. I do have some ideas, and here they are!

First, for the life of me, I can't figure out why they didn't build light rail out to DIA when they built the place. It just seems to me, that would have been a smart thing to do, and would have saved many miles of travel by car. I do know, that the idea was floated originally, but light rail met a political roadblock, which is why it ends in five points today. Don't get me wrong, I think five points is a great neighborhood, but ending the light rail line there, rather than continuing it on to Stapleton and DIA was a fifty year mistake. Now they are looking at building a train line to DIA. While that is better than nothing, I think light rail makes more sense. It is more flexible, and you can take it into neighborhoods where people live and build stations there.

Second, I would think that DIA uses a tremendous amount of electricity. With all those wide open spaces, why not put up some wind turbines? I think those would look very cool on the drive up to the terminal, right before the DIA sign? I also know, there are plenty of other places they can be put that are out of the flight patterns. Make it a part of the landscape, and put them up front where people can see them! The second option would be to install Photoveltic systems!

Third, where the old toll collectors where, there is still an awful lot of pavement where all the lanes used to be. Rip all this up, save some solar heat gain, and also provide less stormwater runoff!

Fourth and final, at least for now, Are the parking lots and general landscaping. I think it is a shame, that when DIA went over budget, landscaping was the first thing to go. Since then, they have installed some, but overall, the landscaping leaves much to be desired. This is supposed to be a world class facility, so it should look like one on the outside, as well as the inside! I do appreciate how they have designed the landscaping to work with the ecosystem, and it is very sustainable and xeric, but there could be more of it. There also needs to be more shade, particulalry in the outlying lots! And more shade where people walk to and from those lots. I have had to make plenty of flights where I was running late, had to park in the hinterlands, and then make a beeline to the terminal. And was it hot! There needs to be some shade, whether it be from trees, or some other kind of structure.

Anyway, those are my ideas for now, any others?

Sustainable Landscapes

One of the ideas to come out of Mayor Hickenloopers "Greenprint Denver" initiative is to plant a million new trees within the metro area over the next 20 years. I find that idea plausible, but I do wonder what the paremeters are. Are these trees to be planted in existing areas, or does that include new developments as well? If it includes new developments, then it will be fairly easy to meet that goal. However, if these are planted in existing areas, then this will make a significant difference in the tree cover. This is good. Trees not only provide shade, they help to reduce the heat sink created from urban development, they help in reducing carbon dioxide by converting that gas back to oxygen, and trees beautify streets, parks, yards, and just about any other area.

One area though that I feel is left out of the picture is water conservation, and creating sustainable landscapes. Watering turf grass in particular is a huge drain on our water resoureces. What can we do though? A big part of it is making a paradigm shift in our collective society about what we consider a nice landscape. Most of us still have the New England mentality that a brilliant green grass is the only acceptable ground cover. But does it have to be? First of all, as a whole, we put way to much water on turfgrass. Part of it is due to outdated and inefficient irrigation systems. Part of it is due to the fact that we don't like to see any brown on our lawns.


I think we are going to have to get used to the idea that our lawns can get a little brown during the heat of summer. Another way to change, is to only plant water thirsty lawns where they actually get used. Do we really need to plants of arterial street edges with grass that only gets looked at as we zoom by at 40 miles per hour? I think not. In those places, we need to start planting drought tolerant grasses that are suitable to our climate. I found such an example in the Ridgegate project in Lone Tree. Another option is actually plant more perennials and shrubs. Sure these cost more in the up front installation, but they certainly use less water than turfgrass, and don't cost any more to maintain than the lawn does. But it does take a new way of thinking. Here at Vignette Studios, we have four projects on the boards where we are taking a hard look at the landscaping and looking for ways to conserve water. Three are new projects, and one is a remodel of an existing condominium complex. More to come on this though.

These are just some of my ideas, I would welcome more comments and thoughts from others!

Sustainability...What does it really mean?

Sustainability. That is the current buzzword of the day in the environmental world, as well as life in general these days. We all hear about creating a sustainable economy, a sustainable tax base, a sustainable energy supply. We even hear about sustainable development. But is anything really sustainable? Wikipedia defines sustainability as seeking "to provide the best outcomes for the human and natural environments both now and into the indefinite future". But is anything that the human race do really sustainable? In my view, the only way that humans can really be sustainable was during the hunting & gathering era which we grew out of eons ago. Lets face it, with our current population levels (which are growing rapidly), we will consume resources on this planet and make an impact.

However, we can make efforts that reduce our impact, minimize waste, and conserve resources as compared to the way we have been living. As a society, we can consiously make efforts to use less energy, drive less, conserve water, live in tighter quarters, etc. This is what I think we mean when we use the term "sustainable". It is simply a new word for conserving.

With this context in mind, I do believe in sustainable development, sustainable landscaping, and other measures as they relate to the built environment. To start with, I think there are things we can do to make our cities more energy efficient. Recently the mayor of Denver, John Hickenlooper, touched on this with his "Greenprint Denver" initiatives outline during his recent "State of the City" address. In this initiative, for example, he calls for replacing some of the worn out city vehicles with hybrids. Another example is to use the methane generated from old landfills to generate electricity. Another idea that has been touted by others is to place Photoveltic systems on city buildings, primarily the Colorado Convention Center.

Another idea that he had was to plant a million new trees within the metro area over the next 20 years. Of course he did also address some of the issues of conserving water to water all those new trees, but he didn't go deep enough.

These are just some of my ideas, I would welcome more comments and thoughts from others!

What Happened?

The other day, I was driving through a neighborhood in the Denver Metro area (I won't name it), and what I saw was very sad. This is a neighborhood that is very much on the verge of ruin. Many of the homes were unkempt, many more vacant with several foreclosures evident in the neighborhood. This is a neighborhood very much in trouble, with many residents down on their luck with probably many on the poverty level. My question is what happened? This neighborhood was largely built in the late 70's through the 80's, so it isn't that old. It was also built by several large builders (some local, and some national) with a large variety of homes styles from entry level to executive level. The impoverishment was spread across the board though, in all home styles.

Now I happen to know that these same builders built the exact same homes in other neighborhoods throughout the metro, and that these communities are very well maintained and desireable places to live. So what happened? What forces cause two very similar neighborhoods to follow very different paths? One neighborhood stays a very desireable place to live, and where home values are maintained. Another seemingly deteriorates literally overnight. I do know that the homes prices in this neighborhood were lower from the get go, due largely to a differnce in land costs, for the same home. But is that the only answer? Or are there other larger socioeconomic factors at play? How do we as community builders try to keep this from happening? Is there anything? I ask, because I dislike it when a community I have worked on goes into decline..for any reason. (No I had nothing to do with this community, well before my time). Any thoughts?