The 300 Millionth Citizen

The other day, in my wanderings around the mountains, I was listening to the Jay Marvin radio show, and they were talking about how on that day, the 300 millionth citizen of this country was supposedly born. Of course, this feat has both sides talking. One side has the economic pundits talking about how this will help the economy to grow and thrive, as growth is good for the overall economy. Of course, the other side, largely environmental, was saying that growth isn't necessarily good, as how are we going to have the resources to care for these people? Not only in physical infrastructure, such as roads, schools, etc., but also with water, electricity, heat, and so on.

I think both sides are right. I do believe that growth is good for the overall economy, as non-growth brings about stagnation. At least in our current economic model, and the only one that I am familiar with. I am also talking about slower sustainable growth, not booming economies. Booms always bust, every time.

However, I also understand where the environmentalist and other no or slow growthers are coming from. Our resources are not finite, we do need to be careful in what we use. I do believe that we can accommodate future growth in our population with sound choices that are made now, that look at the future.

For the most part, our current way of life, and our economy is built on instant satisfaction, on how we get the biggest bang for our buck today. This isn't always bad, as we all enjoy getting the lowest price we can on goods and services. However, we need to look at the life cycle costs of what we do. Is paying an extra $1,000 for a super efficient furnace good for the long haul?

We need to look at our development patterns. We need to build mixed use and mixed income communities. We need to build at higher densities. We need to get away from being dependent on the automobile. We also need to build our homes and commercial buildings for the long haul. If we truly look at what it costs to do it right, and amortize it over the life of the structure, the extra cost is minuscule. We need to build homes that don't fall apart in a few years. We need to build homes far more energy efficiently. The technology is there, it can be done, and it doesn't cost a great deal more.

Take for example, my biggest pet peeve, all the turf grass we plant. Do we really need it all? How much of that turf really get used? How much of it is played on, versus how much it gets looked at, whizzing by at 40 mph? This is where developers and the design community need to honestly think about weighing the cheap costs of installing all that turf now, versus the long term maintenance issues of all that turf. Is it really cheaper? I don't think so. Planting shrubs, perennials, or native grasses might cost more now, but it is also more aesthetically pleasing, and costs less to maintain!

These are just a few of the issues. We all make choices everyday that impact the future. We all need to weigh those choices, and think about the long term impacts.

Think about it.

Stapleton

I have visited this wonderful community several times this summer, with many different friends. For those of you who have not heard of Stapleton, this is one of the largest infill redevelopment projects in the country, right here in Denver. It is on the site of the former Stapleton International Airport, and is based on New Urbanism planning concepts using the Built Green program as a standard for all the homes, and other sustainable measures as well.

This community has several wonderful things about it, but the one I want to focus on today is water conservation, and the effect that has on sustainability. One of the things they have done, is require build to lines for most of the homes within Stapleton. What this does, is require homes to be built close to the street, rather than set way back from the street. Being close to the street has many advantages, among them social interaction, but the best part of it, is that this discourages people from planting front lawns. Most of the homes are set back 8, 10 up to 15 feet from the sidewalk. This dimension is not sufficient to efficiently irrigate turf, so what most people have done is plant it up! The street scape is vibrant with the colorful array of perennials, ornamental grasses, flower pots, and shrubs! It is absolutely gorgeous! The only grass you find here, is in the parkway strips between the street and the sidewalk.

Of course, there are other wonderful water conservation landscape techniques that Stapleton employs, and I will talk about these in future episodes.

Northern Exposure ala "Estes Park"!

Today I had to visit Estes Park for a business meeting. Today also was the first major snowstorm to hit the front range, but that is beside the point. While in Estes Park this morning, I was just amazed to see Elk wandering down the street! This big one was just staring at me, daring me to move my Durango! After he finally got off the street, I parked my car, and this big guy just looked at me, no more than 10 feet away! Obviously they felt very safe and right at home...reminded me of Northern Exposure.

Built Green Homes - Straw Bale Style!

Here is a new twist in the green building movement, at least as far as I know. A Boulder based builder is planning to build 12 straw bale homes in a new urbanist project in Fort Collins, called Old Town North.

The first home that Merten Homes is planning on building is a 3,035 square foot 3-story home that is pictured to the left. This will be followed by a 2 story home next door. As of this point in time, I don't know what the asking price is, but I am highly curious to see these homes constructed. As far as I know, this will be the first attempt by a builder in this area to build straw-bale homes in a multi-home setting, and particularly in an urban environment. Talk about the ultimate in sustainability!

As with the habitat homes, I will follow the construction of these homes, and post updates and pictures, and most curiously, about the structure of these units! And of course, I will be very interested in how the market will react to these units! Stayed Tuned!

The plague of planners...my response

I recently read a Toronto Globe and Mail article that blasted planners, both private and public. Even though, this article was originally posted back in June, I simply have to respond to it. Among many points made in the article, the ones that really rile me is the blame the author places on comprehensive planning for the resulting high density, gridlock, and high housing prices. The author goes on to point out that planning cannot predict and plan for the complexities of the city.

I quote "Urban planning advocates have failed to learn the chief lesson of the 20th century: that comprehensive, centralized government planning does not work. Planning a city or urban area presumes that planners can gather all the data they need, predict the future, and be immune to political pressures...The truth is, no one can ever collect or understand enough data to understand a complex urban area, much less predict the future."

Now I agree with the author that cities are extremely complex places, and changing one thing has a ripple effect through many other things and systems. I also agree that predicting the future is extremely difficult. All we can do is make an educated guess.

But if we don't do comprehensive planning, then what is the alternative? Should we just have a free for all? Should we let anything be built anywhere? Should we ignore the environment? Should we ignore the strain on the infrastructure? Should we just develop in extremely low densities, and gobble up all the farmland? This was basically allowed to happen in Houston until the late 80's. And guess what? They have extreme traffic congestion too! The author doesn't like comprehensive planning, but doesn't offer up any alternatives.

Is comprehensive planning perfect? Heck no, mistakes have been made through history. The author points out the failures of the super blocks of affordable housing. Many of those projects were poorly conceived and planned, but we have learned from them. We have learned that massive blocks of single use planning isn't good for any socio-economic segment, or use. In my mind, the biggest mistake of the last 50 years of development was the invention of single use zoning laws. These are still prevalent in most communities and preclude a mix of incomes and housing types, much less mixing it with commercial and retail.

This is what has caused the gridlock. Single use planning. This forces people to live far from where they shop, far from where they work, far from where they recreate. This has forced people to drive there cars to go shopping, go to work, they even have to drive to the health club to get exercise! This is what makes mixed use zoning so enticing! It allows people to live, work and shop in one area! Heck, you could even have your office downstairs, and live upstairs! This is called New Urbanism, and is something I am a big proponent of.

What would our cities look like today if we hadn't had 50 years of single use zoning? what would have happened if the development patterns of that time prior to the 50's been continued? Would we have had a need for massive superhighways? Would we have a need for supercenters? Would the corner grocery store have survived? Would we have become socially isolated from each other?

People today are looking for that in new communities. A real sense of place and community is almost more important than the home anymore. A connection to your neighbors, feeling safe. I live in megalopolis of Northern Colorado, and the best selling communities by far are new urbanism communities. Communities such as Stapleton and Lowry in Denver are runaway successes. These two communities have managed to create a wide variety of housing with many price points all the way from affordable to multi-million dollar. They have combined merchant housing with custom homes, traditional with modern. They have included the commercial areas, artist studios, work and office space.

I like them because I could live there, have my office, walk to work, and have my bank and grocery store right there! We could get rid of a car!

Imagine that, what if it were possible for every family to reduce itself down to one car....what would happen to gridlock then?

A little more history

Recently my wife and I passed through Georgetown, Colorado, on our way home from a weekend getaway. Well, I decide to find the house that my mom spent her early years in. This was in the mid-40's to the early-50's. They lived on the edge of the mountain, right next to what was then, the city jail. Next to here, is a picture of the house, and believe it or not, it looks almost identicle to when my mom lived there (or so she says). She also says that she remembers it being much bigger when she lived there! My great grandma also lived in Georgetown, in a smaller house down the street, though I don't remember exactly where is was.

My grandpa owned and operated the local newspaper during his tenure there. I don't know the exact dates, but after a bit, he sold that, and started a printing company in Denver, where he made his fortune. My mom remembers traveling to the big city of Idaho Springs to go to the movies, or a night out on the town. Of course, this was all long before the interestate system, much less a good highway system in the mountains, so a trip to Denver was an all day adventure at best, and wasn't done often. After a few years of my grandpa commuting to Denver, they finally sold both Georgetown houses, and all moved to Denver.

Habitat Update 10-05-06

Well, I have been a bad boy, as I am a little tardy in my updates of the Habitat project. I was out there a couple of times, and had forgot my camera! Anyway, there has been a lot of progress made since the last update. The second floor and walls are now up on all of the units, the carraige units above the garages are now built, and most importantly, the roof is now being installed! You can really see them taking shape now!